ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
The use of simulators to acquire ERCP skills: a systematic review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tele-mentoring - a way to expand laparoscopic simulator training for medical students over large distances: a prospective randomized pilot study.BMC medical education · 2023Trial
- A simple model for a complex procedure: broadening access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulation.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel low-cost endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulator with electrocautery training capability: a proof-of-concept study from India.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Saliva stress biomarkers in ERCP trainees before and after familiarisation with ERCP on a virtual simulator.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure with a high risk for adverse events such as post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding. Since endoscopists with less experience have higher adverse event rates, the training of new residents on ERCP simulators has been suggested to improve the resident's technical skills necessary for ERCP. However, there is a lack of consensus on whether the training program should focus on a threshold number of procedures or be more tailored to the individual's performance. Furthermore, there is also disagreement on which form of simulator(s) should be used. Therefore, the primary outcome of this systematic review was to study the extent to which simulators used for ERCP training are correctly validated. Methods: In 2022, a systematic search of the literature was conducted on MEDLINE and SCOPUS under the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 protocol seeking articles with the MeSH terms 'Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography' OR 'ERCP' in combination with 'simulation' OR 'simulator'. Results: The search resulted in 41 references. A total of 19 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. Only one of the articles fulfilled the criteria of a robust validation study. Conclusions: Since only one of the 19 articles met the requirements for a thorough and correct validation, further studies with sufficient numbers of subjects, that evaluate complete preclinical training programs based on validated ERCP simulators are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.