ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
First-line treatment options for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with PD-L1-positive: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab and other programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Pooled it
- First-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Modified RECIST submodels and ordinal regression model predict neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lately, many trials have paid much attention on the oncological outcomes of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. The authors perform a systematic meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of programmed death 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Materials and methods: Literature search through major databases in English and Chinese: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, web of Science and CNKI updated on 10 March 2023. Randomized controlled trials were selected to investigate chemotherapy plus programmed death 1 inhibitor versus chemotherapy. Results: A total of 7 randomised controlled trials including 5788 participants were included. The overall survival (hazard ratio=0.79;95% CI: 0.74-0.85, Conclusion: Programmed death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy have significant antitumour activity compared to chemotherapy alone. However, it is riskier in terms of toxicity than chemotherapy. The authors recommend programmed death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as the optimal treatment regimen for patients with positive programmed death ligand 1 expression, in Asia, male and less than 65 years of age. More well-designed studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different immune plus chemotherapy drug doses and regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.