ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Rectovaginal fistula surgery with horizontal mattress and running suture after unsuccessful first repair: a report of two cases.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair after failed primary repair is uncommon. Patients with RVF experience physiological and sexual dysfunction with a significantly high risk of intravaginal infection and sepsis. There are many surgical procedures available for RVF repair. We performed an improvised transvaginal repair technique. Methods: We report two cases of recurring RVF after failed primary repair. Patient 1 developed RVF because of a failed vaginoplasty due to cosmetic reasons, while patient 2 developed RVF because of a fourth-degree perineal rupture repair post-delivery. We used a combination of horizontal mattress and running suture with the addition of diverting colostomy. Both surgeries went successfully and there were no complications. Outcomes: RVF repair using a combination of horizontal mattress and running suture went successfully and there were no complications. Both patients were able to be discharged after a short stay. Long-term evaluation was done by physical and supporting examinations for 2-3 months. Both patients showed excellent wound healing and physiological function. Conclusions: The combination of a transvaginal horizontal mattress and running suture in the posterior to anterior fashion with diverting colostomy is a safe and effective procedure for recurring RVF repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.