ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Giant staghorn stone causing inferior vena cava compression: a novel case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of possible idiopathic inferior vena cava compression during stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.BMJ case reports · 2025Article
- Unraveling the association of bacteria and urinary stones in patients with urolithiasis: an update review article.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staghorn calculi (SC) are defined as large kidney stones that fill the renal pelvis and at least one renal calyx. They represent 10-20% of all renal stones in developing countries and require prompt diagnosis and management. Massive SC (over 5 cm) are treated exclusively via open surgery, despite percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) being the gold standard treatment for large stones. Descriptions of PCNL for massive SC are very limited in the literature. Case Presentation: We report a case of a 63-year-old male who presented with chronic abdominal pain, hepatosplenomegaly, and normal renal function. He was later diagnosed with polycythemia vera. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed massive, bilateral staghorn stones measuring 7.3×5.5 cm and 1.8×4.5 cm on the right and left, respectively. Additionally, the right stone was found to be compressing the inferior vena cava (IVC). The patient was promptly scheduled for right-sided PCNL and the target of 80% stone fragmentation was successfully attained. Discussion: We present the first case of a stone of such size in the Middle East, as well as the first known case of a renal stone compressing the IVC. Unlike previous reports, the stone was successfully fragmented via PCNL - a procedure that has not been described for stones of such size. Conclusion: This report highlights that ultrasound-guided PNCL without any other intervention is sufficient for the successful treatment of giant SC. Greater research is needed on the potential utility of using ultrasound-guided PCNL for the fragmentation of stones sized over 5 cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.