Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363464›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Mortality predictive value of APACHE II Scores in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.

Hamid Reza Mehryar, Poya Yarahmadi, Babak C Anzali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hamid Reza MehryarDepartment of Emergency Medicine.
Poya YarahmadiDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Babak C AnzaliDepartment of Emergency Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system was developed to predict hospital mortality, which can be used as a predictor of final hospital outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Therefore, the present study was designed and conducted with the aim of determining the average APACHE II score in patients with COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with COVID-19 infection confirmed by PCR test were enrolled in the ICU of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Urmia city during 2020-2022. The laboratory, radiological, and clinical findings of the patients were collected and evaluated. The APACHE II scores of the patients were also calculated by the specialists of ICU and Infectious Diseases Department for each patient and recorded in the checklist. Results: A total of 150 patients were examined in this study. The mean age of the patients was 53.71±16.02 years; 82 patients, or 54.7%, were male, and 68 patients, or 45.3%, were female. The mean APACHE II score was 10.12±6.3; 105 patients (0.70%) were discharged, and 45 patients (0.30%) died. The mean APACHE II score was significantly higher in patients with cough ( Conclusion: Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, cough, shortness of breath, hemoptysis, and renal failure after COVID-19 infection, with a history of dialysis, thyroid disease, hypertension, and diabetes, and intubated patients had a significantly higher APACHE II score. A significant relationship was found between patients' age and the APACHE II score. However, this index was not a suitable criterion for predicting death in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

APACHE II scoreCOVID-19intensive care unitmortalitypatient

Identifiers

PMID37363464
PMCPMC10289627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.