ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Management of floating arm: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A floating elbow and an associated ipsilateral proximal humerus fracture: A case report.Trauma case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The floating arm is a rare fracture, and so far there have been few cases reported. The treatment of this type of fracture is challenging and depends on several factors including age, underlying conditions, daily level of activity, fracture pattern, surgeon's experience, and availability of devices. Case presentation: This study report a 59-year-old man with a rare humeral fracture and a severe crush injury of the forearm. There is a paucity of evidence regarding the management of concomitant floating arm and soft tissue injuries in the literature.The patient was managed by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) followed by a split-thickness skin graft. Clinical discussion: The concurrent presence of the two pathologies exacerbated the patient's condition and made the management challenging. In this case, the authors have used the MIPO approach to fix both fractures with minimal soft tissue injury. To manage the prominent soft tissue injury, we applied the VAC device. VAC has the advantages of reducing edema, controlling bacterial growth, and promoting granulation tissue formation, leading to faster cellular turnover and healing. Conclusions: In patients with floating arm, especially with concomitant soft tissue damage, the MIPO approach is a safe, minimally invasive, and quick method with minimal bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.