Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363441›Full record

ArticleClinical infection in practice2023

Prescribing in a pandemic: Electronic prescribing aids to improve non-specialist adherence to COVID-19 guidelines.

Marc Woodman, Jo Salkeld, Connor Sharrock, C Alice Oborne, Hanna Nguyen, Alka Sobti, Anna L Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infection in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc WoodmanCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Jo SalkeldCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Connor SharrockCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
C Alice OborneCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Hanna NguyenCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Alka SobtiCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Anna L GoodmanCOVID team, Pharmacy & Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 1 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/04Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The evidence around COVID-19 management is continuously evolving. Ensuring awareness of, and adherence to current guidance is challenging. As the second wave of COVID-19 emerged, we recognised the urgent need for better standardisation of patient care in the context of increasing patient load and acuity and the resulting redeployment of staff. Methods: COVID-19 patients admitted to adult medical wards were identified via their positive swab results. An e-prescribing protocol which included five drugs was introduced and adherence to prescribing guidelines assessed via the electronic noting and prescribing system. Doctors' views of the prescribing protocol were assessed. Results: Following introduction of the protocol, adherence to guidelines improved. The proportion of patients either prescribed dexamethasone or with a valid contraindication documented increased from 85% to 97% and for remdesivir this increased from 60% to 79%. There was also significant improvement in the prescription of 'as required' insulin for patients on steroids (26% to 48%) and oxygen (43% to 79%).93% of doctors surveyed were aware of the e-prescribing protocol and 81% had used it. Confidence in adhering to the protocols increased from an average of 3.3 to 4.5 out of 5 and 93% of respondents agreed that the protocol was easy to use. Discussion: Overall, this demonstrates that electronic prescribing protocols can be effective in increasing adherence to guidelines and doctors felt this was a useful tool. This is especially important in a pandemic situation in which many doctors were redeployed outside of their usual specialties.

Indexed as

BundleCOVID-19E-prescribingProtocolSARS-CoV-2Technology

Identifiers

PMID37363441
PMCPMC10063454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.