Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363358›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2023

A Descriptive Study of Maternal Vaccination Uptake, Attitudes, and Beliefs in Pregnancy Among Persons Delivering at an Urban Safety Net Hospital.

Sheree L Boulet, Kaitlyn K Stanhope, Carol DeSantis, Anna Goebel, Julia Dolak, Onyie Eze, Asmita Gathoo, Caroline Braun, Madeline Sutton, Denise J Jamieson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheree L BouletDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-7374
Kaitlyn K StanhopeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Carol DeSantisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Anna GoebelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Julia DolakDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Onyie EzeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-9231
Asmita GathooDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Caroline BraunDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Madeline SuttonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Denise J JamiesonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University · USMorehouse School of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate uptake of influenza, tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), and COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and describe vaccine attitudes and beliefs among predominantly racial and ethnic minority individuals delivering at a publicly funded hospital. Methods: We collected survey and electronic medical record data for English-speaking postpartum individuals who delivered a live-born infant from July 7, 2022, through August 21, 2022, and agreed to participate in our study. The 58-item survey included questions about general vaccine attitudes and beliefs as well as vaccine-specific questions. We calculated rates of influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccinations and compared distributions of survey responses by number (no vaccines, one vaccine, or two or three of the recommended vaccines) and type of vaccines received during pregnancy. Results: Of the 231 eligible individuals, 125 (54.1%) agreed to participate. Rates of influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination were 18.4%, 48.0%, and 5.6% respectively. A total of 61 (48.8%) did not receive any recommended vaccines during pregnancy, 40 (32.0%) received one vaccine, and 24 (19.0%) received two or three vaccines. Approximately 66.1% of the no vaccine group, 81.6% of the one vaccine group, and 87.5% of the two or three vaccine group strongly agreed or agreed that they trusted the vaccine information provided by their obstetrician or midwife. While most (>69.2%) agreed that the vaccine-preventable diseases were dangerous for pregnant women, only 24.0%, 29.3%, and 40.3% agreed that they were worried about getting influenza, whooping cough, or COVID-19, respectively, while pregnant. Discussion: Vaccine uptake in our population was low and may be due, in part, to low perceived susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases. Obstetricians and midwives were trusted sources of vaccine information, suggesting that enhanced communication strategies could be critical for addressing maternal vaccine hesitancy, particularly in communities of color justifiably affected by medical mistrust.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineinfluenza vaccinepertussis vaccinepregnancyvaccinationvaccine hesitancywhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID37363358
PMCPMC10285378
OpenAlexW4379537853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.