ArticleIJID regions2023
Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus among boarding school girls.
Article in IJID regions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Saliva Has High Sensitivity and Specificity for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Compared to Nasal Swabs but Exhibits Different Viral Dynamics from Days of Symptom Onset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With the reopening of schools, the detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children is very important in order to prevent outbreaks in schools and to reduce the risk of more severe post-COVID-19 complications. Various specimens can be used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and saliva has been considered as an alternative specimen in adults. However, data in children are lacking, especially among the female population. This study compared the efficacy of saliva specimens with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Methods: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of saliva among boarding school girls at three time points: diagnosis, and days 7 and 14 since first confirmation using a nasopharyngeal swab specimen. Eighty-four paired samples from 36 individuals were compared. Nasopharyngeal samplings were carried out by trained health officers, while saliva samplings were performed independently by children. Results: The overall percentage agreement (OPA) between saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs was 50.2%. The OPA was 52.8% at diagnosis, and this increased slightly to 54.2% at day 7, and subsequently decreased to 45.8% at day 14. Saliva specimens had sensitivity of 44.6%, specificity of 80.0%, positive predictive value of 94.2% and negative predictive value of 16.3% compared with nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Conclusions: The use of saliva as an alternative specimen for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in children should be considered carefully. Thorough sampling instructions should be given in order to minimize bias in the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.