Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37363154›Full record

ReviewBulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine2023

[Neurological forms of long COVID in adults: Critical approach].

François Chollet, Mélanie Planton, Laurent Sailler, Sébastien De Almeida, Muriel Alvarez, Jérémie Pariente

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François CholletDépartement de neurologie, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Pierre-Paul-Riquet, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Mélanie PlantonDépartement de neurologie, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Pierre-Paul-Riquet, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Laurent SaillerService de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Purpan, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Sébastien De AlmeidaService de médecine interne, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Purpan, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Muriel AlvarezService des maladies infectieuses, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Purpan, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Jérémie ParienteDépartement de neurologie, CHU de Toulouse, hôpital Pierre-Paul-Riquet, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Now recognized by health authorities, long COVID is identified as a frequent condition complicating the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Its polymorphic and sometimes disconcerting clinical expression raises questions about its mechanism. Patterns of clinical expression suggest extensive involvement of the nervous system through an almost ubiquitous cognitive complaint. This article reviews the neurological symptoms and forms of these patients, and the neuropsychological explorations aimed at objectifying a cognitive deficit. The studies published until now confronted with the clinical mode of expression, did not make it possible to define a deficit neuropsychological profile at the level of the groups, and evoked more a functional impairment than a lesion. However, each series mentions a small number of patients in whom a cognitive deficit is objectified. The uncertainties about the causes of the prolonged forms of COVID, the heterogeneity of the published studies, and the virtual absence of temporal evolution data should make one cautious about the interpretation of these data but should in no way delay or prevent taking into account care of these patients.

Indexed as

CognitionNeurologic manifestationsNeuropsychologySevere acute respiratory syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37363154
PMCPMC10282979
OpenAlexW4381510119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.