ArticleResuscitation plus2023
A recorder/time coach decreases time errors during neonatal resuscitation: A randomized, simulation-based clinical trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of team size on the efficiency of time-critical ALS interventions in prehospital cardiac arrest - A prospective randomised multicentre simulation study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- The perceived workload of first-line healthcare professionals during neonatal resuscitation.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Assessment of Visual Attention in Teams with or without Dedicated Team Leaders: A Neonatal Simulation-Based Pilot Randomised Cross-Over Trial Utilising Low-Cost Eye-Tracking Technology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of a Novel Mobile Application for Assessing Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Simulations.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effects of a hands-off recorder/time coach versus an additional hands-on healthcare provider on Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm compliance and team member workload in neonatal resuscitations. Methods: Two interventions were studied using a 2 × 2 factorial design: an additional hands-on team member and the presence of a designated, hands-off recorder/time coach. The recorder/time coach documented interventions and delivered pre-specified prompts at defined points during the resuscitation. The primary outcome was cumulative time error. Secondary outcomes were time to first dose of IV epinephrine, overall team performance as assessed by the Neonatal Resuscitation Performance Evaluation (NRPE) score, and workload assessed by the NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX). Results: 64 teams were studied. Teams with a recorder had a significantly lower cumulative time error compared to teams without a recorder ( Conclusion: A designated, hands-off recorder/time coach improved compliance by decreasing cumulative time error in teams performing complex simulated neonatal resuscitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.