Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Science for art: multi-years' evaluations of biocidal efficacy in support of artwork conservation.

Flavia Bartoli, Daniela Isola, Annalaura Casanova Municchia, Alma Kumbaric, Giulia Caneva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Flavia BartoliInstitute of Heritage Science [Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche - Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale (CNR-ISPC)], National Research Council of Italy, Area della Ricerca di Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Daniela IsolaDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy.
Annalaura Casanova MunicchiaInstitute of Heritage Science [Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche - Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale (CNR-ISPC)], National Research Council of Italy, Area della Ricerca di Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Alma KumbaricDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy.
Giulia CanevaDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the relationship between Science and Art has been gradually strengthened through the use of diagnostic, conservation, and valorization technologies. New technologies can also be used to support the creation and durability of bio-artworks. Within such a context, starting from the Spring of 2014, we performed

Indexed as

Bio-Artbiological recolonizationcyanobacteriascience for cultural heritagestreet artTiber embankments colonizationtreatments durability

Identifiers

PMID37362921
PMCPMC10288146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.