ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Nutrient availability and acid erosion determine the early colonization of limestone by lithobiontic microorganisms.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Difference and environmental drivers of bacterial communities on wall paintings of the Maijishan and Mogao Grottoes, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Cast from the Past? Microbial Diversity of a Neolithic Stone Circle.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Lithic bacterial communities: ecological aspects focusing onFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microorganisms, including the pioneer microorganisms that play a role in the early colonization of rock, are extremely important biological factors in rock deterioration. The interaction of microorganisms with limestone leads to biodeterioration, accelerates soil formation, and plays an important role in the restoration of degraded ecosystems that cannot be ignored. However, the process of microbial colonization of sterile limestone in the early stages of ecological succession is unclear, as are the factors that affect the colonization. Acid erosion (both organic and inorganic), nutrient availability, and water availability are thought to be key factors affecting the colonization of lithobiontic microorganisms. Methods: In this study, organic acid (Oa), inorganic acid (Ia), inorganic acid + nutrient solution (Ia + Nut), nutrient solution (Nut), and rain shade (RS) treatments were applied to sterilized limestone, and the interaction between microorganisms and limestone was investigated using high-throughput sequencing techniques to assess the microorganisms on the limestone after 60 days of natural placement. Results: The results were as follows: (1) The abundance of fungi was higher than that of bacteria in the early colonization of limestone, and the dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota, while the dominant fungal phyla were Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota. (2) Acid erosion and nutrient availability shaped different microbial communities in different ways, with bacteria being more sensitive to the environmental stresses than fungi, and the higher the acidity (Ia and Oa)/nutrient concentration, the greater the differences in microbial communities compared to the control (based on principal coordinate analysis). (3) Fungal communities were highly resistant to environmental stress and competitive, while bacterial communities were highly resilient to environmental stress and stable. Discussion: In conclusion, our results indicate that limestone exhibits high bioreceptivity and can be rapidly colonized by microorganisms within 60 days in its natural environment, and both nutrient availability and acid erosion of limestone are important determinants of early microbial colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.