ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2020
Performance evaluation of Siemens Atellica enhanced estradiol assay.
Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of saliva and blood progesterone to profile the menstrual cycles of youth professional football players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serum estradiol (E2) levels may be used in the diagnostic and/or monitoring of a broad variety of clinical conditions. The aims of this study were to evaluate the Siemens enhanced estradiol assay (eE2) on Atellica IM 1600 (Siemens Healthineers) and to perform a sample comparison with the Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP (Siemens Healthineers). Methods: Within-day and between-day coefficient of variation (CV) were determined using serum sample pools and quality control materials. Six serum samples with decreasing concentrations of E2 were used to assess the limit of quantification. Linearity was evaluated using two different serum samples. Accuracy was evaluated by measuring three certified reference materials. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot were used for comparing Atellica and Centaur XP in 119 serum samples ranging from 45 to 10,059 pmol/L. Results: Within-day and between-day imprecision was <6.6%. Accuracy was <6.0% for all values except for 114 pmol/L (22%). The study of limit of quantification resulted in an interday imprecision <20%. High correlation between measured and expected estradiol dilution results was observed ( Conclusions: The study shows that Atellica eE2 assay presents acceptable imprecision and accuracy and correlates well with Centaur XP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.