ArticleCureus2023
Assessing the Correlation Between Patient-Specific Characteristics and Braden Pressure Injury Risk Score at a Suburban Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing the Waterlow and Jackson/Cubbin pressure injury risk scales in intensive care units: A multi-centre study.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Pressure injury (PI) is a frequent complication of hospital admissions, and it increases healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to use the Braden scale to assess the PI risk among hospitalized patients without PI and determine its association with patient-specific factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at a suburban tertiary hospital involving a total of 211 hospitalized patients recruited during the study period (October 2022). Patients were assessed using the Braden scale and their sociodemographic data were also recorded. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The mean age of the patients was 41.8 ±23.0 years and 54.0% of the patients were females. The average Braden score of the patients was 19.01 ±3.42, and more than half (58.3%) of the patients showed no risk while only 0.9% of the patients had a severe risk of PI. There was a statistically significant association between PI risk and patients' age (r=-0.353, R=12.5%, p<0.001), pre-admission occupation (F=10.290, p<0.001) as well as the ward of admission (F=11.915, p<0.001). However, gender and social support were not significantly associated. Conclusion The age, pre-admission occupation, and ward of admission of patients were found to be significantly associated with the risk of developing PI. It is recommended that more resources be channeled toward preventing PI among high-risk patients in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.