ArticleCureus2023
Rouviere's Sulcus Analysis: A Critical Safety Analysis and a Guide to Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bile Duct Injury and Litigation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Global Review of Current and Future Preventative Initiatives.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Review
- When Critical View of Safety Fails: A Practical Perspective on Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most frequent surgical operation in general surgery. The focus of recent research has been on improving the procedure's safety. Over 80% of healthy livers have Rouviere's sulcus (RVS), which is a natural notch in the right lobe that is present in proximity to the confluence of the bile duct. It is frequently considered an important component of safety during LC. RVS demarcates the area of the common bile duct (CBD) from the liver bed for the gall bladder. This research intends to evaluate the frequency, its relation to CBD, and the critical view of safety (CVS) during LC. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn observational study was performed in a cohort of 50 patients listed for LC between September 2021 and September 2022. The presence of RVS was confirmed after liver retraction and dissection commenced. After the creation of CVS, its relationship with CBD was documented. Additionally, the position of the cystic lymph node was also documented during the dissection.
resultsThe findings of this study revealed that out of 50 patients, only 40 (80%) had RVS. However, cystic lymph nodes were present more frequently in 48 (96%) patients. CVS was achieved in all the patients, and it revealed the presence of RVS above the cystic duct-CBD junction in 37 (74%), at the level of the junction in 11 (22%), and in two (4%) where the junction could not be demarcated.
conclusionRVS is a reliable marker to dissect laterally to CBD while doing LC, which does not require any dissection and can be appreciated early during the procedure. However, its presence along with the cystic lymph node gives a better anatomical understanding of the area of CBD, thereby assisting in conducting the procedure safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.