ArticleCureus2023
Comparison of Extended Total Extraperitoneal (E-TEP) Repair and Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Marfan syndrome complicated with obturator hernia.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Randomised Comparison of Extended View Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) and Conventional Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) for Inguinal Hernia.Journal of the West African College of SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimTo find the superiority of extended total extraperitoneal (E-TEP) repair and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair in inguinal hernia repair. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 30 patients with a unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia (IH), and recurrent IH, following open repair were studied. Out of 30 patients, laparoscopic TAPP or E-TEP mesh repair was performed in an equal number of inguinal hernia patients. The patient's demographic parameters, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were compared.
resultsIn the E-TEP group, 33.33% of patients had left inguinal hernia (LIH), 60% of patients were diagnosed with right inguinal hernia (RIH) and 6.67% of patients had right inguinal and right direct hernia (RDH). In the TAPP group, 33.33% of patients had LIH and 53.33% of patients were suffering from RIH. Moreover, 6.67% of patients were diagnosed with a left inguinal direct hernia, and a similar proportion of patients had a right inguinal direct hernia. The mean duration of surgery was found to be significantly higher in the TAPP group (P<0.0000). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.07±0.59 and 2.80±1.32 days in E-TEP and TAPP groups, respectively (P=0.044).
conclusionIn the present study, E-TEP mesh repair is a superior technique in the management of inguinal hernia as compared with TAPP repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.