ArticleCureus2023
Association of the Clinical and Radiographic Findings at Onset With Future Joint Destruction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSince inflammation can cause joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it is assumed that joints that are symptomatic at onset are at higher risk of joint destruction; however, this theory remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether the progression of joint destruction in hands and feet could be predicted from the clinical and radiographic findings at onset.
methodsThis study included 75 patients who visited our hospital within one year after the onset of RA with at least 12 months of follow-up. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) and the sensitivity of the clinical findings (swelling, tenderness, and squeeze test) and joint destruction at onset for the progression of joint destruction.
resultsSixty joints (45 metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, 15 metatarsophalangeal joints) exhibited progressive structural destruction during the study course. Both the PPV and the sensitivity of the clinical findings for the progression of joint destruction were low; however, only the sensitivity of the squeeze test for the feet was high. The PPV of joint destruction at onset was higher than the clinical findings, and the sensitivity of joint destruction at onset was as high as the squeeze test for the feet. Conclusions: Regular follow-up with imaging is necessary regardless of symptoms and joint destruction at the onset. Adding the squeeze test for feet to routine clinical practice may help predict the risk of joint destruction for the feet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.