ArticleThe journal of cardiovascular aging2023
Thrombosis and myocardial infarction: the role of bioresorbable scaffolds.
Article in The journal of cardiovascular aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Functional Vascular Stents for Cardiovascular Therapy with Drug Delivery and Computational Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Integrating stent design and microstructural characterization to improve clinical outcomes of bioresorbable stents.Materials & design · 2025Article
- Biodegradable Stents in the Treatment of Arterial Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Stent thrombosis: a contemporary guide to definitions, risk factors, and management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary stents have dramatically improved the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. In-stent-restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST) pose major obstacles to the success of coronary stenting. Drug-eluting stents (DES) emerged as a major breakthrough in stenting and significantly reduced ISR. Despite taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), very late ST has remained a major obstacle in the success of DES. This occurs regardless of the type of polymer or antiproliferative agent in the contemporary stents. Such adverse events occur at a rate of approximately 2% to 3% per year after first year, which have been attributed to the strut fractures, loss of vessel compliance and vasomotion, and neoatherosclerosis. Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have emerged in an effort to overcome these limitations leading to a "leave nothing behind" approach. While appealing, the initial experience with BRS technology was hampered by increased rates of BRS thrombosis compared with DES. In this review, we summarized underlying mechanisms leading to BRS failure and provided insights into optimizing BRS deployment with intravascular imaging. In addition, we outlined the perspectives of new generations BRS with thinner struts and new designs as well as alternative materials to improve outcome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.