Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362388›Full record

ArticleThe journal of cardiovascular aging2023

Thrombosis and myocardial infarction: the role of bioresorbable scaffolds.

Massoud A Leesar, Marc D Feldman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of cardiovascular aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massoud A LeesarDivision of Cardiology University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Marc D FeldmanDivision of Cardiology, the University of Texas Health, San Antonio.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Transvenous Optoacoustic-Ultrasound Guided Cold Laser Wire for Crossing Coronary Chronic Total OcclusionR01HL163582 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FELDMAN, MARC, MILNER, THOMAS E · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
Wireless System for Ambulatory Rodents to Measure Pressure and Volume in the Left VentricleR44HL132705 · NHLBI · KORONIS BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORAT · PI RIEHLE, TIMOTHY H. · 2019 to 2020
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL163582NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL132705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary stents have dramatically improved the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. In-stent-restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST) pose major obstacles to the success of coronary stenting. Drug-eluting stents (DES) emerged as a major breakthrough in stenting and significantly reduced ISR. Despite taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), very late ST has remained a major obstacle in the success of DES. This occurs regardless of the type of polymer or antiproliferative agent in the contemporary stents. Such adverse events occur at a rate of approximately 2% to 3% per year after first year, which have been attributed to the strut fractures, loss of vessel compliance and vasomotion, and neoatherosclerosis. Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have emerged in an effort to overcome these limitations leading to a "leave nothing behind" approach. While appealing, the initial experience with BRS technology was hampered by increased rates of BRS thrombosis compared with DES. In this review, we summarized underlying mechanisms leading to BRS failure and provided insights into optimizing BRS deployment with intravascular imaging. In addition, we outlined the perspectives of new generations BRS with thinner struts and new designs as well as alternative materials to improve outcome.

Identifiers

PMID37362388
PMCPMC10288217
OpenAlexW4313416180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.