Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362387›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

Millimetric scale two-photon Bessel-Gauss beam light sheet microscopy with three-axis isotropic resolution using an axicon lens.

Cléophace Akitegetse, Thomas Charland, Mireille Quémener, Charles Gora, Véronique Rioux, Michel Piché, Yves De Koninck, Martin Lévesque, Daniel C Côté

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cléophace AkitegetseCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-6257
Thomas CharlandCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Mireille QuémenerCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Charles GoraCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2605-3942
Véronique RiouxCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Michel PichéCentre d'Optique, Photonique et Laser, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Yves De KoninckCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5779-9330
Martin LévesqueCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-3746
Daniel C CôtéCentre de recherche CERVO, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-6948
Université Laval · CAInstitut National d'Optique · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Typical light sheet microscopes suffer from artifacts related to the geometry of the light sheet. One main inconvenience is the non-uniform thickness of the light sheet obtained with a Gaussian laser beam. Aim: We developed a two-photon light sheet microscope that takes advantage of a thin and long Bessel-Gauss beam illumination to increase the sheet extent without compromising the resolution. Approach: We use an axicon lens placed directly at the output of an amplified femtosecond laser to produce a long Bessel-Gauss beam on the sample. We studied the dopaminergic system and its projections in a whole cleared mouse brain. Results: Our light sheet microscope allows an isotropic resolution of Conclusion: The proposed system's sheet extent and resolution surpass currently available systems, enabling the fast imaging of large specimens.

Indexed as

axiconBessel-Gausslight sheettwo-photon

Identifiers

PMID37362387
PMCPMC10288127
OpenAlexW4381803608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.