ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2023
Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report the surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes of the different surgical techniques used for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all fertility-sparing procedures performed between 2004 and 2020. The study included patients desiring to preserve fertility who had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma histology, all grades, and FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IB1 tumors. Results: 48 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients (16.7%) had stage IA2, and 40 (83.3%) had stage IB1 tumors. Conization with pelvic lymph node assessment was performed in 5 (10.4%) patients, an open radical trachelectomy in 21 (43.8%), and a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in 22 (45.8%). No major intraoperative complications were registered. Two patients required surgery due to an early postoperative complication. Late postoperative complications were seen in 15 patients (31.2%), with cervical stenosis being the most frequent (60%). The rate of DFS at 2 and 5 years was 89% (95% CI, 76-95%), and the 5- year OS was 96% (95% CI, 83-98%). Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between tumor size and recurrence, but not for other prognostic tumor factors or surgical approach. One patient (4.8%) developed recurrent disease in the open radical trachelectomy group, and five (22.7%) in the laparoscopic radical trachelectomy group. The pregnancy rate was 41.4%, and the live birth rate 88.2%. Conclusion: Fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is ever-evolving. This study adds information to the literature about the outcomes of these quite uncommon procedures, and allows a critical analysis of many of the topics which are under discussion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.