ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
A versatile, bioengineered skin reconstruction device designed for use in austere environments.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrochemical sensing of cell viability: A scalable platform from 2D monolayers to 3D tissue models.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Hyaluronic acid-ibuprofen conjugation: a novel ototherapeutic approach protecting inner ear cells from inflammation-mediated damage.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Austere environments in which access to medical facilities, medical personnel, or even water and electricity is limited or unavailable pose unique challenges for medical device product design. Currently existing skin substitutes are severely inadequate for the treatment of severe burns, chronic wounds, battlefield injuries, or work-related injuries in resource-limited settings. For such settings, an ideal device should be biocompatible, bioresorbable, promote tissue healing, not require trained medical personnel for deployment and use, and should enable topical drug delivery. As proof of concept for such a device, silk fibroin and an antioxidant hyaluronic acid derivative were chosen as primary constituents. The final formulation was selected to optimize tensile strength while retaining mechanical compliance and protection from reactive oxygen species (ROS). The ultimate tensile strength of the device was 438.0 KPa. Viability of dermal fibroblasts challenged with ROS-generating menadione decreased to 49.7% of control, which was rescued by pre-treatment with the hyaluronic acid derivative to 85.0% of control. The final device formulation was also tested in a standardized, validated,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.