Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362059›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023

Reservoir based spiking models for univariate Time Series Classification.

Ramashish Gaurav, Terrence C Stewart, Yang Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ramashish GauravDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Terrence C StewartUniversity of Waterloo Collaboration Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Yang YiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of advanced machine learning and deep learning algorithms achieve state-of-the-art performance on various temporal processing tasks. However, these methods are heavily energy inefficient-they run mainly on the power hungry CPUs and GPUs. Computing with Spiking Networks, on the other hand, has shown to be energy efficient on specialized neuromorphic hardware, e.g., Loihi, TrueNorth, SpiNNaker, etc. In this work, we present two architectures of spiking models, inspired from the theory of Reservoir Computing and Legendre Memory Units, for the Time Series Classification (TSC) task. Our first spiking architecture is closer to the general Reservoir Computing architecture and we successfully deploy it on Loihi; the second spiking architecture differs from the first by the inclusion of non-linearity in the readout layer. Our second model (trained with Surrogate Gradient Descent method) shows that non-linear decoding of the linearly extracted temporal features through spiking neurons not only achieves promising results, but also offers low computation-overhead by significantly reducing the number of neurons compared to the popular LSM based models-more than 40x reduction with respect to the recent spiking model we compare with. We experiment on five TSC datasets and achieve new SoTA spiking results (-as much as 28.607% accuracy improvement on one of the datasets), thereby showing the potential of our models to address the TSC tasks in a green energy-efficient manner. In addition, we also do energy profiling and comparison on Loihi and CPU to support our claims.

Indexed as

Legendre Memory UnitsLoihiReservoir Computing (RC)Spiking Neural Network (SNN)Surrogate Gradient DescentTime Series Classification (TCS)

Identifiers

PMID37362059
PMCPMC10285304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.