ReviewAcute medicine & surgery
Can Gram staining be a guiding tool for optimizing initial antimicrobial agents in bacterial infections?
Review in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- The Performance of Gram-Staining in Tailoring the Empirical Antibiotic Choice in Operated Diabetic Foot Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Can Gram staining be a guiding tool for optimizing initial antimicrobial agents in bacterial infections?Acute medicine & surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms poses a significant threat to global public health, making the optimization of antimicrobial use crucial. Antimicrobial therapy is often initiated in emergency rooms (ERs) and intensive care units (ICUs), where patients are at high risk of infection. Prompt antimicrobial selection is essential in these facilities, and point-of-care testing can guide the appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. Gram staining, a quick and inexpensive method, was previously used for point-of-care testing by physicians in the 1980s but was discontinued in 1988 in the United States. However, in Japan, the clinical practice of Gram stain-based antimicrobial therapy by physicians has continued in a limited number of hospitals. Several studies undertaken in Japan have shown that Gram staining carried out by trained physicians can reduce the overuse of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents in ERs and ICUs without worsening patients' outcomes. Gram stain-based antimicrobial therapy reduced unnecessary use of carbapenems in the ER. Furthermore, Gram staining has been shown to significantly reduce the overuse of broad-spectrum antimicrobials without worsening clinical cure and mortality for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in the ICU. The classic technique of Gram staining has regained its usefulness through persistent clinical practice in Japan. It is hoped that Japanese researchers in this field will demonstrate to the world the efficacy of the classic technique of Gram staining in addressing this critical problem. Gram staining carried out by trained physicians could serve as a valuable means of optimizing antimicrobial treatment in ERs and ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.