Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362019›Full record

ArticlePorto biomedical journal

Breast cancer in young women: a rising threat: A 5-year follow-up comparative study.

Urânia Fernandes, Gonçalo Guidi, Daniela Martins, Bruno Vieira, Clara Leal, Carolina Marques, Francisca Freitas, Margarida Dupont, Juliana Ribeiro, Carina Gomes and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Young Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Why Is No One Telling Me to Get a Mammogram?Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Urânia FernandesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-877X
Gonçalo GuidiGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-1468
Daniela MartinsGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-4599
Bruno VieiraGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-6489
Clara LealGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2387-5144
Carolina MarquesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-7649
Francisca FreitasGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-5639
Margarida DupontGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Juliana RibeiroGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-7090
Carina GomesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-4703
Rita MarquesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-6443
Paulo AvelarGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Ana Sofia EstevesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
João Pinto-de-SousaGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Centre Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Clinical Academic Centre Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CACTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9756
Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer in young women is usually considered as breast cancer occurring in women younger than 40 years and is the most frequent cancer-related cause of death in these patients. In the past few years, there seems to be an increasing trend in the prevalence of breast cancer in young women, which, associated with poorer prognosis, more aggressive histologic features, and more frequent recurrence rates, makes it a rising threat to young women. This study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of breast cancer in young women in our institution. Material and methods: A retrospective, unicentric, cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. All consecutive patients with breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Cases were divided into two groups: case group, those younger than 40 years, and control group, those 40 years or older. The exclusion criterion was nonoperative treatment. Several clinical and pathologic parameters were evaluated, as well as were overall survival time and disease-free survival time. Results: The incidence of breast cancer in young women presented a rising tendency over the study period. Significant differences were observed in the comparison of the groups according to body mass index, age at menarche, age at birth of the first child, and proliferation rate. There were no differences in overall survival and disease-free survival rates between the groups. Conclusions: Young women had a more symptomatic presentation, a greater tumor proliferation rate, but similar outcomes compared with older patients. Greater multicentric studies are needed to confirm or refute these results.

Indexed as

agebreast canceryoung women

Identifiers

PMID37362019
PMCPMC10289488
OpenAlexW4382052629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.