Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361952›Full record

ArticleEmpirical economics2023

How effective are universal payments for raising consumption? Evidence from a natural experiment.

Seungjun Baek, Seongeun Kim, Tae-Hwan Rhee, Wonmun Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Empirical economics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seungjun BaekDepartment of International Business and Trade, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Seongeun KimDepartment of Economics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-2031
Tae-Hwan RheeDepartment of Economics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
Wonmun ShinDepartment of Economics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the impact of the universal stimulus payments (100-350 thousand KRW per person) distributed by the largest Korean province of Gyeonggi during the COVID-19 pandemic on household consumption using large-scale credit and debit card data from Korea Credit Bureau. As the neighboring Incheon metropolitan city did not distribute stimulus payments, we employ a difference-in-difference approach and find that the stimulus payments increased monthly consumption per person by approximately 30 thousand KRW within the first 20 days. The overall marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of the payments was approximately 0.40 for single families. The MPC decreased from 0.58 to 0.36 as the transfer size increased from 100-150 to 300-350 thousand KRW. We also found that the effects of universal payments were very heterogeneous across different groups of people. The MPC for liquidity-constrained households, which account for 8% of all households, was close to one, but the MPCs of the other household groups were not significantly different from zero. The unconditional quantile treatment effect estimates reveal that there was a positive and significant increase in monthly consumption only in the lower part of the distribution below the median. Our results show that a more targeted approach may more efficiently achieve the policy goal of boosting aggregate demand.

Indexed as

ConsumptionCOVID-19Difference in differenceMarginal propensity to consumeStimulus payments

Identifiers

PMID37361952
PMCPMC10041496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.