ArticleBrain communications2023
Proteomics and relationship with axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis: 5-year diffusion tensor imaging study.
Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as a Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Investigation of the association of serum GFAP and NfL with brain and upper cervical MRI volumes in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and MOGAD.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Serum Biomarker Signatures of Choroid Plexus Volume Changes in Multiple Sclerosis.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Serum Biomarkers of Vascular Involvement in Childhood Uveitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Plasma proteomic profiles of UK Biobank participants with multiple sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers can be economic and easily accessible tools for monitoring and predicting disease activity in multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of a multivariate proteomic assay for concurrent and future microstructural/axonal brain pathology in a longitudinal study of a heterogeneous group of people with multiple sclerosis. A proteomic analysis was obtained on serum samples from 202 people with multiple sclerosis (148 relapsing-remitting and 54 progressive) at baseline and 5-year follow-up. The concentration of 21 proteins related to multiple pathways of multiple sclerosis pathophysiology was derived using Proximity Extension Assay on the Olink platform. Patients were imaged on the same 3T MRI scanner at both timepoints. Тhe rate of whole brain, white matter and grey matter atrophy over the 5-year follow-up was determined using the multi-timepoint Structural Image Evaluation, using Normalisation, of Atrophy algorithms. Lesion burden measures were also assessed. The severity of microstructural axonal brain pathology was quantified using diffusion tensor imaging. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of normal-appearing brain tissue, normal-appearing white matter, grey matter, T2 and T1 lesions were calculated. Age, sex and body mass index-adjusted step-wise regression models were used. Glial fibrillary acidic protein was the most common and highest-ranked proteomic biomarker associated with greater concurrent microstructural central nervous system alterations (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.