Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361715›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2023

Variation in prognosis and treatment outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a Biology of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Consortium proposal for a practical definition and stratified medicine classifications.

Guido Rubboli, Christoph P Beier, Kaja K Selmer, Marte Syvertsen, Amy Shakeshaft, Amber Collingwood, Anna Hall, Danielle M Andrade, Choong Yi Fong, Joanna Gesche and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Guido RubboliDanish Epilepsy Centre, Filadelfia, Dianalund 4293, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-2514
Christoph P BeierDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark.
Kaja K SelmerDepartment of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0372, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-112X
Marte SyvertsenDepartment of Neurology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust, Oslo 3004, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-4247
Amy ShakeshaftDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-5413
Amber CollingwoodDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Anna HallDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Danielle M AndradeAdult Epilepsy Genetics Program, Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 0S8, Canada.
Choong Yi FongDivision of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Joanna GescheDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark.
David A GreenbergAbigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus 43215, USA.
Khalid HamandiDepartment of Neurology, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK.
Kheng Seang LimDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Ching Ching NgInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Alessandro OrsiniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa 56126, Italy.
BIOJUME Consortium
Pasquale StrianoPediatric Neurology and Muscular Disease Unit, IRCCS Istituto 'G. Gaslini', Genova 16147, Italy.
Rhys H ThomasNewcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.
Jana ZarubovaDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-8091
Mark P RichardsonDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-3140
Lisa J StrugProgram in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 1X8, Canada.
Deb K PalDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable definitions, classifications and prognostic models are the cornerstones of stratified medicine, but none of the current classifications systems in epilepsy address prognostic or outcome issues. Although heterogeneity is widely acknowledged within epilepsy syndromes, the significance of variation in electroclinical features, comorbidities and treatment response, as they relate to diagnostic and prognostic purposes, has not been explored. In this paper, we aim to provide an evidence-based definition of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showing that with a predefined and limited set of mandatory features, variation in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy phenotype can be exploited for prognostic purposes. Our study is based on clinical data collected by the Biology of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Consortium augmented by literature data. We review prognosis research on mortality and seizure remission, predictors of antiseizure medication resistance and selected adverse drug events to valproate, levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Based on our analysis, a simplified set of diagnostic criteria for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy includes the following: (i) myoclonic jerks as mandatory seizure type; (ii) a circadian timing for myoclonia not mandatory for the diagnosis of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; (iii) age of onset ranging from 6 to 40 years; (iv) generalized EEG abnormalities; and (v) intelligence conforming to population distribution. We find sufficient evidence to propose a predictive model of antiseizure medication resistance that emphasises (i) absence seizures as the strongest stratifying factor with regard to antiseizure medication resistance or seizure freedom for both sexes and (ii) sex as a major stratifying factor, revealing elevated odds of antiseizure medication resistance that correlates to self-report of catamenial and stress-related factors including sleep deprivation. In women, there are reduced odds of antiseizure medication resistance associated with EEG-measured or self-reported photosensitivity. In conclusion, by applying a simplified set of criteria to define phenotypic variations of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, our paper proposes an evidence-based definition and prognostic stratification of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Further studies in existing data sets of individual patient data would be helpful to replicate our findings, and prospective studies in inception cohorts will contribute to validate them in real-world practice for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy management.

Indexed as

classificationdefinitiondrug resistancejuvenile myoclonic epilepsyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37361715
PMCPMC10288558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.