ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023
Inequity in care delivery in cardio-oncology: dissecting disparities in underrepresented populations.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Mortality Risk After Cancer Diagnosis by County-Level Characteristics in the United States 2000-2021.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardio-Oncology Care.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Investigating modifiable risk factors associated with ideal cardiovascular health among cancer survivors: a scoping review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Navigating the crossroads: cardiometabolic risks in cancer survivorship - a comprehensive review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Navigating the crossroads: cardiometabolic risks in cancer survivorship - a comprehensive review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Social Determinants of Health in Cardio-Oncology: Multi-Level Strategies to Overcome Disparities in Care:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Cancer and cardiotoxicity in the transgender population.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well known that patients with cancer have a significantly higher cardiovascular mortality risk than the general population. Cardio-oncology has emerged to focus on these issues including risk reduction, detection, monitoring, and treatment of cardiovascular disease or complications in patients with cancer. The rapid advances in early detection and drug development in oncology, along with socioeconomic differences, racial inequities, lack of support, and barriers to accessing quality medical care, have created disparities in various marginalized populations. In this review, we will discuss the factors contributing to disparities in cardio-oncologic care in distinct populations, including Hispanic/Latinx, Black, Asian and Pacific Islander, indigenous populations, sex and gender minorities, and immigrants. Some factors that contribute to differences in outcomes in cardio-oncology include the prevalence of cancer screening rates, genetic cardiac/oncologic risk factors, cultural stressors, tobacco exposure rates, and physical inactivity. We will also discuss the barriers to cardio-oncologic care in these communities from the racial and socioeconomic context. Appropriate and timely cardiovascular and cancer care in minority groups is a critical component in addressing these disparities, and there need to be urgent efforts to address this widening gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.