Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Feasibility study of adaptive radiotherapy for esophageal cancer using artificial intelligence autosegmentation based on MR-Linac.

Huadong Wang, Xin Liu, Yajun Song, Peijun Yin, Jingmin Zou, Xihua Shi, Yong Yin, Zhenjiang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huadong WangDepartment of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Yajun SongDepartment of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Peijun YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jingmin ZouDepartment of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Xihua ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Yong YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Zhenjiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shandong Tumor Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We proposed a scheme for automatic patient-specific segmentation in Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy based on daily updated, small-sample deep learning models to address the time-consuming delineation of the region of interest (ROI) in the adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow. Additionally, we verified its feasibility in adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: Nine patients with EC who were treated with an MR-Linac were prospectively enrolled. The actual adapt-to-position (ATP) workflow and simulated ATS workflow were performed, the latter of which was embedded with a deep learning autosegmentation (AS) model. The first three treatment fractions of the manual delineations were used as input data to predict the next fraction segmentation, which was modified and then used as training data to update the model daily, forming a cyclic training process. Then, the system was validated in terms of delineation accuracy, time, and dosimetric benefit. Additionally, the air cavity in the esophagus and sternum were added to the ATS workflow (producing ATS+), and the dosimetric variations were assessed. Results: The mean AS time was 1.40 [1.10-1.78 min]. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the AS model gradually approached 1; after four training sessions, the DSCs of all ROIs reached a mean value of 0.9 or more. Furthermore, the planning target volume (PTV) of the ATS plan showed a smaller heterogeneity index than that of the ATP plan. Additionally, V5 and V10 in the lungs and heart were greater in the ATS+ group than in the ATS group. Conclusion: The accuracy and speed of artificial intelligence-based AS in the ATS workflow met the clinical radiation therapy needs of EC. This allowed the ATS workflow to achieve a similar speed to the ATP workflow while maintaining its dosimetric advantage. Fast and precise online ATS treatment ensured an adequate dose to the PTV while reducing the dose to the heart and lungs.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapyartificial intelligenceautomatic segmentationesophageal cancerMR-linac

Identifiers

PMID37361583
PMCPMC10289262
OpenAlexW4380047359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.