ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Feasibility study of adaptive radiotherapy for esophageal cancer using artificial intelligence autosegmentation based on MR-Linac.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated workflow for target volume propagation in online adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for lung lesions using foundation models.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Optimal timing of the cumulative dose and factors related to acute urinary toxicity in prostate cancer treated using magnetic resonance linear accelerator.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in adaptive radiotherapy-a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- MR-Guided Radiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer: From Principles to Practice-A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Improving segmentation precision in prostate cancer adaptive radiation therapy with a patient-specific network.PloS one · 2025Article
- Assessing intra- and interfraction motion and its dosimetric impacts on cervical cancer adaptive radiotherapy based on 1.5T MR-Linac.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- CBCT (Cone-Beam CT)-Based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in the Post-operative Oesophageal Cancer Patient.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We proposed a scheme for automatic patient-specific segmentation in Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy based on daily updated, small-sample deep learning models to address the time-consuming delineation of the region of interest (ROI) in the adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow. Additionally, we verified its feasibility in adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: Nine patients with EC who were treated with an MR-Linac were prospectively enrolled. The actual adapt-to-position (ATP) workflow and simulated ATS workflow were performed, the latter of which was embedded with a deep learning autosegmentation (AS) model. The first three treatment fractions of the manual delineations were used as input data to predict the next fraction segmentation, which was modified and then used as training data to update the model daily, forming a cyclic training process. Then, the system was validated in terms of delineation accuracy, time, and dosimetric benefit. Additionally, the air cavity in the esophagus and sternum were added to the ATS workflow (producing ATS+), and the dosimetric variations were assessed. Results: The mean AS time was 1.40 [1.10-1.78 min]. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the AS model gradually approached 1; after four training sessions, the DSCs of all ROIs reached a mean value of 0.9 or more. Furthermore, the planning target volume (PTV) of the ATS plan showed a smaller heterogeneity index than that of the ATP plan. Additionally, V5 and V10 in the lungs and heart were greater in the ATS+ group than in the ATS group. Conclusion: The accuracy and speed of artificial intelligence-based AS in the ATS workflow met the clinical radiation therapy needs of EC. This allowed the ATS workflow to achieve a similar speed to the ATP workflow while maintaining its dosimetric advantage. Fast and precise online ATS treatment ensured an adequate dose to the PTV while reducing the dose to the heart and lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.