ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Clinical Application to Improve the "Depth Perception Problem" by Combining Augmented Reality and a 3D Printing Model.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our experience with intraoperative evaluation and educational application of augmented reality technology, an illusion of depth has been a major problem. To improve this depth perception problem, we conducted two experiments combining various three-dimensional models and holograms and the observation angles using an augmented reality device. Methods: In experiment 1, when observing holograms projected on the surface layer of the model (bone model) or holograms projected on a layer deeper than the model (body surface model), the observer's first impression regarding which model made it easier to understand positional relationships was investigated. In experiment 2, to achieve a more quantitative evaluation, the observer was asked to measure the distance between two specific points on the surface and deep layers from two angles in each of the above combinations. Statistical analysis was performed on the measurement error for this distance. Results: In experiment 1, the three-dimensional positional relationships were easier to understand in the bone than in the body surface model. In experiment 2, there was not much difference in the measurement error under either condition, which was not large enough to cause a misunderstanding of the depth relationship between the surface and deep layers. Conclusions: Any combination can be used for preoperative examinations and anatomical study purposes. In particular, projecting holograms on a deep model or observing positional relationships from not only the operator's viewpoint, but also multiple other angles is more desirable because it reduces confusion caused by the depth perception problem and improves understanding of anatomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.