Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361495›Full record

ReviewAdvances in laboratory medicine2020

Liquid biopsy for cancer management: a revolutionary but still limited new tool for precision medicine.

María Arechederra, Matías A Ávila, Carmen Berasain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Integrating ctDNA testing forAdvances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

María ArechederraHepatology Program, CIMA, University of Navarra, Avda. Pio XII, n55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4830-1924
Matías A ÁvilaHepatology Program, CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Carmen BerasainHepatology Program, CIMA, University of Navarra, Avda. Pio XII, n55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term liquid biopsy is used in contraposition to the traditional "solid" tissue biopsy. In the oncology field it has opened a new plethora of clinical opportunities as tumor-derived material is shedded into the different biofluids from where it can be isolated and analyzed. Common biofluids include blood, urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural effusion or bile. Starting from these biological specimens several analytes can be isolated, among which we will review the most widely used: circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA), proteins, metabolites, and exosomes. Regarding the nature of the biomarkers it will depend on the analyte, the type of tumor and the clinical application of the liquid biopsy and it includes, somatic point mutations, deletions, amplifications, gene-fusions, DNA-methylated marks, tumor-specific miRNAs, proteins or metabolites. Here we review the characteristics of the analytes and the methodologies used for their isolation. We also describe the applications of the liquid biopsy in the management of patients with cancer, from the early detection of cancers to treatment guidance in patients with advanced tumors. Finally, we also discuss some current limitations and still open questions.

Indexed as

circulating biomarkerscirculating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)personalized medicinetumor circulome

Identifiers

PMID37361495
PMCPMC10197281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.