ArticleJournal of pesticide science2023
Metagenomic analysis of ready biodegradability tests to ascertain the relationship between microbiota and the biodegradability of test chemicals.
Article in Journal of pesticide science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A suitable solvent for adsorption of poorly water-soluble substances onto silica gel in a ready biodegradability test.Journal of pesticide science · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of trimethylated α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrins as optimal dispersants for ready biodegradability testing of poorly water-soluble substances.Journal of pesticide science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ready biodegradability tests conducted in accordance with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines (test 301C or test 301F) are performed using activated sludge (AS) prepared by the Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute (AS-CERI) or that taken from a sewage treatment plant (AS-STP). It had been reported that AS-CERI had lower activity than AS-STP in biodegrading test chemicals, and that biodegradation was accelerated by increasing the volume of the test medium. However, these phenomena have not been clarified from the perspective of the microbiota. In this study, using metagenomic analysis, we first showed that the microbiota of AS-CERI was biased in its distribution of phyla, less diverse, and had greater lot-to-lot variability than that of AS-STP. Second, after cultivation for a long period of time, the microbiota of AS-STP and AS-CERI became more similar to each other in terms of community structure. Third, determining degraders of test substances when each substance was actively biodegraded was found to be an effective approach. Finally, we clarified experimentally that a large volume of test medium increased the number of species that could degrade test substances in the condition where the initial concentrations of each substance and AS-STP were kept constant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.