Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361242›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2023

Immersive training of clinical decision making with AI driven virtual patients - a new VR platform called medical tr.AI.ning.

Marvin Mergen, Anna Junga, Benjamin Risse, Dimitar Valkov, Norbert Graf, Bernhard Marschall, medical tr.AI.ning consortium

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A virtual patient authoring tool for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marvin MergenSaarland University, Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Homburg, Germany.
Anna JungaUniversity of Münster, Institute of Education and Student Affairs, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin RisseUniversity of Münster, Institute for Geoinformatics, Münster, Germany.
Dimitar ValkovSaarland University, Department of Computer Science, Homburg, Germany.
Norbert GrafSaarland University, Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Homburg, Germany.
Bernhard MarschallUniversity of Münster, Institute of Education and Student Affairs, Münster, Germany.
medical tr.AI.ning consortium
Saarland University · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students need to be prepared for various situations in clinical decision-making that cannot be systematically trained with real patients without risking their health or integrity. To target system-related limitations of actor-based training, digital learning methods are increasingly used in medical education, with virtual reality (VR)- training seeming to have high potential. Virtually generated training scenarios allow repetitive training of highly relevant clinical skills within a protected, realistic learning environment. Thanks to Artificial Intelligence (AI), face-to-face interaction with virtual agents is feasible. Combining this technology with VR-simulations offers a new way of situated context-based, first-person training for medical students. Project goal and method: The authors' aim is to develop a modular digital training platform for medical education with virtual, interactable agents and to integrate this platform into the medical curriculum. The medical tr.AI.ning platform will provide veridical simulation of clinical scenarios with virtual patients, augmented with highly realistic medical pathologies within a customizable, realistic situational context. Medical tr.AI.ning is scaled to four complementary developmental steps with different scenarios that can be used separately and so each outcome can successively be integrated early within the project. Every step has its own focus (visual, movement, communication, combination) and extends an author toolbox through its modularity. The modules of each step will be specified and designed together with medical didactics experts. Perspective: To ensure constant improvement of user experience, realism, and medical validity, the authors will perform regular iterative evaluation rounds.Furthermore, integration of medical tr.AI.ning into the medical curriculum will enable long-term and large-scale detection of benefits and limitations of this approach, providing enhanced alternative teaching paradigms for VR technology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceClinical Decision-MakingComputer SimulationCurriculumHumansartificial intelligencemedical educationvirtual patientsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37361242
PMCPMC10285366
OpenAlexW4382182189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.