Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361190›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

External validation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool.

Frances M Russell, Audrey Herbert, Sarah Kennedy, Benjamin Nti, Mollie Powell, Jean Davis, Robinson Ferre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ULTRA-Metrics: Delphi-Derived Framework for Assessing Ultrasound Competency.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frances M RussellDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-7392
Audrey HerbertDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-9851
Sarah KennedyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-7766
Benjamin NtiDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-9177
Mollie PowellDepartment of Emergency Medicine IU Health Bloomington Hospital Bloomington Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-1146
Jean DavisDepartment of Education Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.
Robinson FerreDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-4416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a core component of emergency medicine (EM) residency training. No standardized competency-based tool has gained widespread acceptance. The ultrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT) was recently derived and validated. We sought to externally validate the UCAT in a 3-year EM residency program. Methods: This was a convenience sample of PGY-1 to -3 residents. Utilizing the UCAT and an entrustment scale, as described in the original study, six different evaluators split into two groups graded residents in a simulated scenario involving a patient with blunt trauma and hypotension. Residents were asked to perform and interpret a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examination and apply the findings to the simulated scenario. Demographics, prior POCUS experience, and self-assessed competency were collected. Each resident was evaluated simultaneously by three different evaluators with advanced ultrasound training utilizing the UCAT and entrustment scales. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between evaluators was calculated for each assessment domain; analysis of variance was used to compare UCAT performance and PGY level and prior POCUS experience. Results: Thirty-two residents (14 PGY-1, nine PGY-2, and nine PGY-3) completed the study. Overall, ICC was 0.9 for preparation, 0.57 for image acquisition, 0.3 for image optimization, and 0.46 for clinical integration. There was moderate correlation between number of FAST examinations performed and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. There was poor correlation between self-reported confidence and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. Conclusions: We had mixed results in our attempt to externally validate the UCAT with poor correlation between faculty and moderate to good correlation with faculty to diagnostic sonographer. More work is needed to validate the UCAT before adoption.

Identifiers

PMID37361190
PMCPMC10288010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.