Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361072›Full record

ArticleAnnals of operations research2023

Data driven flexible supplier network of selfcare essentials during disruptions in supply chain.

Ankur Chauhan, Harpreet Kaur, Sachin K Mangla, Yasanur Kayikci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of operations research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ankur ChauhanJaipuria Institute of Management, Noida, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9552-4752
Harpreet KaurIndian Institute of Management, Amritsar, India.
Sachin K ManglaJindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University, Haryana, India.
Yasanur KayikciDepartment of Engineering and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During disruptive events, supply chains struggle to meet the demand due to limitations posed by logistics, transportation and supply side failures. In the present study, a flexible supplier network of personal protective equipment (PPEs), such as face masks, hand sanitizers, gloves, and face shields, has been modelled using an extensive risk enabled data driven decision making for addressing disruptions in the supply chain. This paper studies various risks which exists in PPE supply chain and evaluates the total supplier risk based on them. Furthermore, the paper proposes a Multi-objective Mixed Integer Linear Program (MOMILP) to optimally select suppliers and the sustainable allocation of orders under various risks, namely disruption, delay, receivables, inventory, and capacity. The proposed MOMILP model is also extended to promptly revise the orders to other suppliers under a disruption scenario enabling an effective response resulting in minimization of stockouts. The criteria-risk matrix is developed with the help of supply chain experts from industry and academia. Conclusively, the numerical case study and its computational analysis is conducted on the PPE data received from distributors to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model. The findings suggest that the proposed flexible MOMILP can optimally revise allocations during disruptions to drastically reduce the stockouts and minimize overall cost of procurement in the PPE supply network.

Indexed as

DisruptionsMOMILPPandemic COVID-19Personal protective equipment (PPE)Supplier riskSustainable order allocation

Identifiers

PMID37361072
PMCPMC10089828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.