Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37361065›Full record

ArticleAnnals of operations research2023

Clustering networked funded European research activities through rank-size laws.

Roy Cerqueti, Antonio Iovanella, Raffaele Mattera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of operations research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roy CerquetiDepartment of Social and Economic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A. Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1871-7371
Antonio IovanellaSchool of Economics, University of International Studies of Rome - UNINT, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 200, 00147 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-3747
Raffaele MatteraDepartment of Social and Economic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A. Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-7049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper treats a well-established public evaluation problem, which is the analysis of the funded research projects. We specifically deal with the collection of the research actions funded by the European Union over the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development and Horizon 2020. The reference period is 2007-2020. The study is developed through three methodological steps. First, we consider the networked scientific institutions by stating a link between two organizations when they are partners in the same funded project. In doing so, we build yearly complex networks. We compute four nodal centrality measures with relevant, informative content for each of them. Second, we implement a rank-size procedure on each network and each centrality measure by testing four meaningful classes of parametric curves to fit the ranked data. At the end of such a step, we derive the best fit curve and the calibrated parameters. Third, we perform a clustering procedure based on the best-fit curves of the ranked data for identifying regularities and deviations among years of research and scientific institutions. The joint employment of the three methodological approaches allows a clear view of the research activity in Europe in recent years.

Indexed as

Cluster analysisComplex networksEuropean research projectsRank-size analysis

Identifiers

PMID37361065
PMCPMC10161996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.