Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360968›Full record

ArticleOnline social networks and media2023

Beyond fear and anger: A global analysis of emotional response to Covid-19 news on Twitter using deep learning.

Francisco Bráulio Oliveira, Davoud Mougouei, Amanul Haque, Jaime Simão Sichman, Hoa Khanh Dam, Simon Evans, Aditya Ghose, Munindar P Singh

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Online social networks and media, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco Bráulio OliveiraUniversity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Davoud MougoueiDeakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Amanul HaqueNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Jaime Simão SichmanUniversity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Hoa Khanh DamUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Simon EvansUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Aditya GhoseUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Munindar P SinghNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The media has been used to disseminate public information amid the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the Covid-19 news has triggered emotional responses in people that have impacted their mental well-being and led to news avoidance. To understand the emotional response to the Covid-19 news, we study user comments on the news published on Twitter by 37 media outlets in 11 countries from January 2020 to December 2022. We employ a deep-learning-based model to identify one of the 6 Ekman's basic emotions, or the absence of emotional expression, in comments to the Covid-19 news, and an implementation of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify 12 different topics in the news messages. Our analysis finds that while nearly half of the user comments show no significant emotions, negative emotions are more common. Anger is the most common emotion, particularly in the media and comments about political responses and governmental actions in the United States. Joy, on the other hand, is mainly linked to media outlets from the Philippines and news on vaccination. Over time, anger is consistently the most prevalent emotion, with fear being most prevalent at the start of the pandemic but decreasing and occasionally spiking with news of Covid-19 variants, cases, and deaths. Emotions also vary across media outlets, with Fox News having the highest level of disgust, the second-highest level of anger, and the lowest level of fear. Sadness is highest at Citizen TV, SABC, and Nation Africa, all three African media outlets. Also, fear is most evident in the comments to the news from The Times of India.

Indexed as

Covid-19Deep learningEmotionMediaNewsTopic modelingTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37360968
PMCPMC10266509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.