ReviewInternational journal of electrochemical science2022
Electrochemical biosensors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 pathogen and protein biomarkers.
Review in International journal of electrochemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and Functional Treatment of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Fibrosis-Stratified Network Meta-Analysis of Epidural Adhesiolysis and Neuromodulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a quality control test for diphtheria vaccine based on an electrochemical aptamer-based biosensor.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Exosome Detection: Current Advances, Challenges, and Prospects for Glaucoma Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Progress in electric field assisted molecular imprinting technology].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Review
- A smartphone aptasensor for fipronil detection in honey samples.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Hybridization Chain Reaction-Based Electrochemical Biosensors by Integrating the Advantages of Homogeneous Reaction and Heterogeneous Detection.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Electrochemical (Bio)Sensing Devices for Human-Microbiome-Related Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Role of Estradiol Hormone in Human Life and Electrochemical Aptasensing of 17β-Estradiol: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV CoV-2) pathogen and protein biomarkers can improve the diagnosis accuracy for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Electrochemical biosensors have attracted extensive attention in the scientific community because of their simple design, fast response, good portability, high sensitivity and high selectivity. In this review, we summarized the progress in the electrochemical detection of COVID-19 pathogen and SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers, including SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid protein and their antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.