Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2023

Ensemble-based classification approach for PM2.5 concentration forecasting using meteorological data.

S Saminathan, C Malathy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S SaminathanDepartment of Computing Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
C MalathyDepartment of Networking and Communications, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution is a serious challenge to humankind as it poses many health threats. It can be measured using the air quality index (AQI). Air pollution is the result of contamination of both outdoor and indoor environments. The AQI is being monitored by various institutions globally. The measured air quality data are kept mostly for public use. Using the previously calculated AQI values, the future values of AQI can be predicted, or the class/category value of the numeric value can be obtained. This forecast can be performed with more accuracy using supervised machine learning methods. In this study, multiple machine-learning approaches were used to classify PM2.5 values. The values for the pollutant PM2.5 were classified into different groups using machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and their grid search equivalents, along with the deep learning method multilayer perceptron. After performing multiclass classification using these algorithms, the parameters accuracy and per-class accuracy were used to compare the methods. As the dataset used was imbalanced, a SMOTE-based approach for balancing the dataset was used. Compared to all other classifiers that use the original dataset, the accuracy of the random forest multiclass classifier with SMOTE-based dataset balancing was found to provide better accuracy.

Indexed as

air quality forecastimbalanced data setmulticlass classificationSMOTEsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID37360751
PMCPMC10289837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.