Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360663›Full record

ArticleClinical simulation in nursing2023

Nursing Students Reported More Positive Emotions about Training during COVID-19 After Using a Virtual Simulation Paired with an In-person Simulation.

Jason M Harley, Elif Bilgic, Clarissa H H Lau, Andrew Gorgy, Hugo Marchand, Susanne P Lajoie, Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay, Gerald M Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical simulation in nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jason M HarleyDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Elif BilgicDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Clarissa H H LauDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrew GorgyDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hugo MarchandIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Susanne P LajoieDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mélanie Lavoie-TremblayIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gerald M FriedDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Virtual simulations (VS) are educational tools that can help overcome the limitations of in-person learning highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research has illustrated that VS can support learning, but little is known about the usability of VS as a distance learning tool. Research on students' emotions about VS is also scarce, despite the influence of emotions on learning. Methods: A quantitative longitudinal study was conducted with undergraduate nursing students. 18 students participated in a hybrid learning experience involving a virtual simulation (VS) followed by an in-person simulation. Students completed questionnaires about their emotions, perceived success, and usability and received a performance score from the VS. Results: Nursing students reported statistically significant improvements in their emotions about completing their program after completing both VS and in-person simulations compared to their emotions before the pair of simulations. Emotions directed toward the VS were weak-to-moderate in strength, but predominantly positive. Positive emotions were positively associated with nursing students' performance. Findings replicated "okay" approaching "good" usability ratings from a recent study with key methodological differences that used the same software. Conclusions: VS can be an emotionally positive, effective, efficient, and satisfying distance learning supplement to traditional simulations.

Indexed as

Blended learningDistance learningEmotionUsabilityVirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID37360663
PMCPMC10150196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.