ReviewBrain and neuroscience advances
Identifying applications of virtual reality to benefit the stroke translational pipeline.
Review in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, stroke and its management have been studied extensively. Despite numerous pre-clinical studies identifying therapeutic targets, development of effective, specific pharmacotherapeutics remain limited. One significant limitation is a break in the translational pipeline - promising pre-clinical results have not always proven replicable in the clinic. Recent developments in virtual reality technology might help generate a better understanding of injury and recovery across the whole research pipeline in search of optimal stroke management. Here, we review the technologies that can be applied both clinically and pre-clinically to stroke research. We discuss how virtual reality technology is used to quantify clinical outcomes in other neurological conditions that have potential to be applied in stroke research. We also review current uses in stroke rehabilitation and suggest how immersive programmes would better facilitate the quantification of stroke injury severity and patient recovery comparable to pre-clinical study design. By generating continuous, standardised and quantifiable data from injury onset to rehabilitation, we propose that by paralleling pre-clinical outcomes, we can apply a better reverse-translational strategy and apply this understanding to animal studies. We hypothesise this combination of translational research strategies may improve the reliability of pre-clinical research outcomes and culminate in real-life translation of stroke management regimens and medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.