Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360544›Full record

ArticleNeurotrauma reports2023

Discrete Fourier Transform Windowing Techniques for Cerebral Physiological Research in Neural Injury: A Practical Demonstration.

Logan Froese, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Alwyn Gomez, Izzy Marquez, Fiorella Amenta, Carleen Batson, Kevin Y Stein, Frederick A Zeiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Logan FroeseBiomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Amanjyot Singh SainbhiBiomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alwyn GomezSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Izzy MarquezUndergraduate Engineering Program, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Fiorella AmentaUndergraduate Engineering Program, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Carleen BatsonDepartment of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kevin Y SteinBiomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Frederick A ZeilerBiomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To optimally assess oscillatory phenomena within physiological variables, spectral domain transforms are used. A discrete Fourier transform (DFT) is one of the most common methods used to attain this spectral change. In traumatic brain injury (TBI), a DFT is used to derive more complicated methods of physiological assessment, particularly that of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). However, a practical application of a DFT will introduce various errors that need to be considered. This study will evaluate the pulse amplitude DFT derivation of intracranial pressure (AMP) to highlight how slight differences in DFT methodologies can impact calculations. Utilizing a high-frequency prospectively maintained data set of TBI patients with recorded arterial and intracranial blood pressure, various cerebral physiological aspects of interest were assessed using the DFT windowing methods of rectangular, Hanning, and Chebyshev. These included AMP, CVR indices (including the pressure reactivity and pulse amplitude index), and the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (with all methods of CVR). The results of the different DFT-derived windowing methods were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test and histogram plots between individual patients and over the whole 100-patient cohort. The results for this analysis demonstrate that, overall and for grand average values, there were limited differences between the different DFT windowing techniques. However, there were individual patient outliers to whom the different methods resulted in noticeably different overall values. From this information, for derived indices utilizing a DFT in the assessment of AMP, there are limited differences within the resulting calculations for larger aggregates of data. However, when the amplitude of spectrally resolved response is important and needs to be robust in smaller moments in time, it is recommended to use a window that has amplitude accuracy (such as Chebyshev or flat-top).

Indexed as

blood flowFourier transformmodels of injurypulse amplitudetraumatic brain injurywaveform

Identifiers

PMID37360544
PMCPMC10288301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.