Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360245›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization as Diagnostic Tool for Implant-associated Infections: A Pilot Study on Added Value.

Catharina Scheuermann-Poley, Alexandra Wiessner, Judith Kikhney, Renate Gatzer, Martin Müller, Marcus Stichling, Annette Moter, Christian Willy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catharina Scheuermann-PoleyFrom the Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Centre Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Bundeswehr (Military) Academic Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Alexandra WiessnerBiofilmcenter, Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin and MoKi Analytics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Judith KikhneyBiofilmcenter, Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin and MoKi Analytics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Renate GatzerDepartment of Microbiology, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Bundeswehr (Military) Academic Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Microbiology, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Bundeswehr (Military) Academic Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus StichlingFrom the Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Centre Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Bundeswehr (Military) Academic Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Annette MoterBiofilmcenter, Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin and MoKi Analytics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Christian WillyFrom the Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Centre Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Bundeswehr (Military) Academic Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implant-associated infections are a devastating complication in surgery. Especially in infections with biofilm-forming microorganisms, the identification of the causing microorganism remains a challenge. However, the classification as biofilm is not possible with conventional polymerase chain reaction or culture-based diagnostics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and nucleic acid amplification technique (FISHseq) to discuss a diagnostic benefit of the culture-independent methods and to map spatial organization of pathogens and microbial biofilms in wounds. Methods: In total, 118 tissue samples from 60 patients with clinically suspected implant-associated infections (n = 32 joint replacements, n = 24 open reduction and internal fixation, n = 4 projectiles) were analyzed using classic microbiological culture and culture-independent FISH in combination with polymerase chain reaction and sequencing (FISHseq). Results: In 56 of 60 wounds, FISHseq achieved an added value. FISHseq confirmed the result of cultural microbiological examinations in 41 of the 60 wounds. In 12 wounds, one or more additional pathogens were detected by FISHseq. FISHseq could show that the bacteria initially detected by culture corresponded to a contamination in three wounds and could exclude that the identified commensal pathogens were a contamination in four other wounds. In five wounds, a nonplanktonic bacterial life form was detected. Conclusions: The study revealed that FISHseq gives additional diagnostic information, including therapy-relevant findings that were missed by culture. In addition, nonplanktonic bacterial life forms could also be detected with FISHseq, albeit less frequently than previously indicated.

Identifiers

PMID37360245
PMCPMC10287136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.