ReviewProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)2023
A systematic review of cardiac
Review in Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Impact of calcifications on paravalvular leakage by transcatheter aortic valve prostheses: findings from a new in silico clinical trial framework.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Trial
- In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: Virtual Patients, Applications, and Regulatory Convergence.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- The functional impact of myofiber macroscopic organization and disarray in computational models of the murine heart.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Weaving the Digital Tapestry: Methods for Emulating Cohorts of Cardiac Digital Twins Using Gaussian Processes.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Reduction of Animal Use in Cardiovascular Translational Medicine: Regulatory and Technological Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cardiac digital twins: a tool to investigate the function and treatment of the diabetic heart.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
- Advancing rare disease therapeutics through digital twins: Opportunities in drug development and precision dosing.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Mechanistic insights into effects of the cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil from mechanokinetic modelling.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Building Digital Twins for Cardiovascular Health: From Principles to Clinical Impact.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Tapping into Nature's Arsenal: Harnessing the Potential of Natural Antioxidants for Human Health and Disease Prevention.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Synthetic data in radiological imaging: current state and future outlook.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in heart valve disease: diagnosis, innovation and treatment. A state-of-the-art review.The British journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Constructing bilayer and volumetric atrial models at scale.Interface focus · 2023Article
- Advancing clinical translation of cardiac biomechanics models: a comprehensive review, applications and future pathways.Frontiers in physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models of the heart are now being used to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of interventions through
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.