Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360223›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2023

The contribution of physician associates or assistants to the emergency department: A systematic scoping review.

Nicole M A King, Munaf Habeeb, Suzannah Helps

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07735663 (The Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education in Masters PA Medicine Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07735663 completednot on this map

The Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education in Masters PA Medicine Education

TypeobservationalSponsorBelmont UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsFocus of Study Pain KnowledgeArmsPain education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Doctors', Patients' and Physician Associates' Perceptions of the Physician Associate Role in the Emergency Department.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole M A KingUniversity of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK.
Munaf HabeebUniversity of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK.
Suzannah HelpsUniversity of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: New health care professionals, such as the physician associate or assistant (PA), have expanded the ability of health systems to meet the needs of the population in both primary and secondary health care settings. Although PAs are widely deployed in the emergency department (ED), their role in the ED has not previously been formally described. This systematic scoping review synthesizes and critically analyzes existing literature on the impact and perception of the role of PAs working in the ED. Methods: We performed a systematic scoping review. We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and EMCare for English language peer-reviewed studies describing PA roles in the ED. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included. We assessed the quality of the articles using QualSyst and the mixed methods appraisal tool. Themes regarding PA roles in the ED were identified. Results: We included a total of 31 studies. Themes identified in the review included perceptions of the PA, wait times, acuity of patients seen, length of stay, those leaving without being seen (LWBS), clinical outcomes, pre-admission rates, well-being and scope of practice. Both the doctors' and patients' perception of PAs in the ED were generally high. The hindrance of them not being able to prescribe was evident. Studies showed a reduction in waiting times, length of stay, readmission rates, and those leaving without being seen when PAs work in the ED seeing moderate- to low-acuity patients. Evidence shows that PAs have a positive impact and the perceptions of the PAs are high in international EDs. There is significant evidence of PAs being key members of the health care team. Their work is particularly helpful for low- to moderate-acuity patients. With the increase in health care demand and a suffering UK National Health Service (NHS), the evidence synthesized in this review supports the potential positive impact PAs can have on the NHS and more specifically, the improvements of ED throughput metrics. Conclusions: This review identified the roles and positive influence of PAs in the ED. These findings highlight current and future challenges for PAs in the ED.

Indexed as

emergency departmentphysician assistantphysician associatesystematic scoping review

Identifiers

PMID37360223
PMCPMC10288079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.