Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360184›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2023

Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.

Matthew Brandorff, Julia Graham, Kirana Gudi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew BrandorffDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Campus, New York, NY USA.
Julia GrahamDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Campus, New York, NY USA.
Kirana GudiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3263-6142
Cornell University · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Approach Training in Respiratory ResearchT32HL134629 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Robert J Kaner, Heather Winona Stout Delgado · 2018 to 2026
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review: This paper assesses recent literature on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization. Specifically, to determine if there is an optimal revascularization strategy for this patient population, and if there are other modalities to assess the risks. Recent findings: There are limited new data in the last year addressing this clinical question. Recently there have been a series of studies which reinforced that COPD is a key independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after revascularization. There is no optimal revascularization strategy; however, there was a nonsignificant signal of potential benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with short-term outcomes in the SYNTAXES trial. Currently, pulmonary function tests (PFT) are limited in clarifying risk assessments prior to revascularization, and there are investigations into the use of biomarkers to provide further insight into this increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD. Summary: COPD is a key risk factor for poor outcomes in patients requiring revascularization. More investigations are needed to determine the optimum revascularization strategy.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive lung diseaseCoronary artery diseaseRevascularization strategy

Identifiers

PMID37360184
PMCPMC10239707
OpenAlexW4379279970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.