ArticleAI and ethics2023
A global perspective on data powering responsible AI solutions in health applications.
Article in AI and ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- PREFER-IT: A transdisciplinary co-created framework to realise inclusive health AI.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Transforming Healthcare with AI: Promises, Pitfalls, and Pathways Forward.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Transformative potential of artificial intelligence in global health policy.Journal of market access & health policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare AI solutions have the potential to transform access, quality of care, and improve outcomes for patients globally. This review suggests consideration of a more global perspective, with a particular focus on marginalized communities, during the development of healthcare AI solutions. The review focuses on one aspect (medical applications) to allow technologists to build solutions in today's environment with an understanding of the challenges they face. The following sections explore and discuss the current challenges in the underlying data and AI technology design on healthcare solutions for global deployment. We highlight some of the factors that lead to gaps in data, gaps around regulations for the healthcare sector, and infrastructural challenges in power and network connectivity, as well as lack of social systems for healthcare and education, which pose challenges to the potential universal impacts of such technologies. We recommend using these considerations in developing prototype healthcare AI solutions to better capture the needs of a global population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.