ArticleJDS communications2023
Impact of parity differences on residual feed intake estimation in Holstein cows.
Article in JDS communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social dominance and feed efficiency: Genetic analysis of latency to first meal after fresh feed delivery and residual feed intake in dairy cows.JDS communications · 2026Article
- Correlating the oral swab microbial community with milk production metrics in Holstein dairy cows.mSphere · 2025Article
- Associations between body temperature and feed efficiency traits in lactating Holstein cows.JDS communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residual feed intake (RFI) has been used as a measure of feed efficiency in farm animals. In lactating dairy cattle, RFI is typically obtained as the difference between dry matter intake observations and predictions from regression on known energy sinks, and effects of parity, days in milk, and cohort. The impact of parity (lactation number) on the estimation of RFI is not well understood, so the objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate alternative RFI models in which the energy sinks (metabolic body weight, body weight change, and secreted milk energy) were nested or not nested within parity, and (2) estimate variance components and genetic correlations for RFI across parities. Data consisted of 72,474 weekly RFI records of 5,813 lactating Holstein cows collected from 2007 to 2022 in 5 research stations across the United States. Estimates of heritability, repeatability, and genetic correlations between weekly RFI for parities 1, 2, and 3 were obtained using bivariate repeatability animal models. The nested RFI model showed better goodness of fit than the nonnested model, and some partial regression coefficients of dry matter intake on energy sinks were heterogeneous between parities. However, the Spearman's rank correlation between RFI values calculated from nested and nonnested models was equal to 0.99. Similarly, Spearman's rank correlation between the RFI breeding values from these 2 models was equal to 0.98. Heritability estimates for RFI were equal to 0.16 for parity 1, 0.19 for parity 2, and 0.22 for parity 3. Repeatability estimates for RFI across weeks within parities were high, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57. Spearman's rank correlations of sires' breeding values were 0.99 between parities 1 and 2, 0.91 between parities 1 and 3, and 0.92 between parities 2 and 3. We conclude that nesting energy sinks within parity when computing RFI improves model goodness of fit, but the impact on the estimated breading values appears to be minimal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.