Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37360124›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2023

Partial enrichment of phospholipids by enzymatic hydrolysis and membrane filtration of whey protein phospholipid concentrate.

A V Swaminathan, M S Molitor, K J Burrington, D Otter, J A Lucey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Whey Protein Phospholipid Concentrate and Its Fractions as a Diet Intervention Enhance Bone Health and Alter the Gut Microbiome in Weanling Mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A V SwaminathanDepartment of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
M S MolitorCenter for Dairy Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
K J BurringtonCenter for Dairy Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
D OtterCenter for Dairy Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J A LuceyDepartment of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whey protein phospholipid concentrate (WPPC) contains high amounts of phospholipids (PL; 4.5 ± 1%) but there is interest in further enriching the PL content for nutritional and functional applications. Chemical methods were unsuccessful in separating PL from proteins due to the presence of protein-fat aggregates. Instead, we explored hydrolysis of the proteins to peptides with the objective of removing peptides, thereby concentrating the PL fraction. We used microfiltration (MF) with a pore size of 0.1 µm to help reduce protein/peptide retention. Hydrolyzing proteins should facilitate passage of low molecular weight peptides through the MF membrane, while concentrating fat and PL in the MF retentate. Bench-top experiments were performed to select the proteolytic enzyme that resulted in the most extensive hydrolysis of proteins in WPPC from among 5 different commercial proteases. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE analysis was performed to measure the extent of protein hydrolysis over a period of 4 h. Alcalase enzyme was found to exhibit the highest proteolytic activity at conditions of pH 8 and temperature 55°C. The intensity of major protein bands (milkfat globule membrane proteins, caseins, β-lactoglobulin) in WPPC decreased in sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE profiles as hydrolysis progressed, along with the appearance of low molecular weight bands. Pilot-scale MF production, coupled with diafiltration (DF), of the hydrolyzed sample aided in the removal of peptides that caused an ~18% reduction in protein content with the final retentate having a total PL content of 9.3% dry basis (db) with protein and fat contents at approximately 43.8 ± 0.4% (db) and 48.9 ± 1.2% (db), respectively. The MF permeate had minimal fat content, indicating that there was no transmission of lipids or PL through the membrane during the MF/DF process. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and particle size analysis of enzyme hydrolyzed solution revealed that protein aggregates were still present after 1 h of hydrolysis. Complete removal of proteins and peptides was not achieved by this process, suggesting that a combination of enzymes would be needed for further hydrolysis of protein aggregates in WPPC solution to further enrich the PL content.

Identifiers

PMID37360124
PMCPMC10285240
OpenAlexW4321794217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.